Economic Populism - Instablogs
Economic Populism
Celso Camargo , Campinas: Jun 24 2008
Made Popular Jun 24 2008
Brazil :

Every big country is full of contradictions, this fact seems to be a rule. Here in Brazil it could not be different. According to the IPEA (Institute of Applied Economic Research), the inequality of income between the poorest and the richest decreased in the last six years.

This is a fact that should be celebrated, because the wages of workers who have less income increased by four times (21.96%) compared to the wages of workers in higher income (4.91%). The explanation given for this occurrence is that the minimum wage increased their purchasing power in the recent years through annual adjustments made by the current federal administration.

But there is another factor that can not be ignored and that was also recorded by the same Institute. The poorest people in Brazil pay 44.5% more taxes than the 10% richest. The total amount of taxes that the poorest families pay representing 32.8% of their income, while for the richest, the tax burden represents 22.7% .

But why there is this difference? The explanation lies in taxation, or in the way taxes are collected. The taxation may be directly or indirectly. In Brazil, the richest pay more to direct taxation, through the Income Tax, for example. Meanwhile the poorest pay the indirect, focuses on basic products for their survival, like food.

What we can conclude about this data then? The lives of millions of Brazilians have indeed improved, but inequality persists, however disguised. That is the hidden face of an economic policy that favors the rich, which owns 75% of the wealth of the country. The economic populism of the current administration says is always in favour of the less privileged, but in practice, what you see is the permanence of inequality.

Economic Populism

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Alex
Brasilia, Brazil
The disparity is alarming, and government which came on promise of bringing equality has failed in keeping up to its words. The people are not at all safe anywhere and even a person like Pele was recently robbed. Do you think in such a disparate times one won't resort to crime and violence.
1 Stars
This always happens! The rich and influential business class always have a lobbying power in the government and they can influence policy decisions. Populism is just a fancy word. They should rather move towards ”realism”!
1 Stars
In Brazil, the President Lula is considered a ”god” in some places. But those people are nor able to see what he is really doing to the country.
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
The solution might be for the government to institute a value-added tax or an expanded value-added tax, but exempt basic commodities. It might work this way.

”Sin” taxes (on cigarettes and liquor)should be increased. Minimum wage earners should also be exempted from income tax.
1 Stars
Plz grace! cigarettes and liquor are already heavily taxed! if some poor soul wants to find solace in a couple of drinks he should be able to do so!

And there is always a slab on income taxes (at least so in India)...tax is not charged below a certain reasonable limit...
1 Stars
The problem in Brazil is that the most basics products, like rice and sugar, have abusive taxes on them. And who pays for those are the most needed in society.
1 Stars
Grace Calderon
Quezon City, Philippines
I mean, put the tax on consumption, not production or labor and employment. But, of course, exempt basic goods and commodities.

If taxes are cruel on the relatively low income earners, they will move to the underground economy where they can ignore taxes.
Add your Comment