If you ever come to Brazil and traveling by the capitals of states, often you’ll ask “Am I in the same country?”. The imposing of Sao Paulo, the extraordinary beauty of Rio de Janeiro, the organization in Curitiba are just some of the examples I can cite. But behind these differences, there is something that is common to almost all the major Brazilian cities, the social apartheid.

Social apartheid in Brazil
This form of apartheid manifests itself in various forms in Brazil. The disparities are so big that even in poverty there are differences that should not be ignored. Want an example? Living in the slums of Rio or Sao Paulo can often be better than living in certain regions of Brazil. Although there are differences between the slums, the most populated slum of Sao Paulo is so “consolidated” that even large banks started to open bank branches to serve the local population.
And one of the best ways to illustrate the social and economic disparities is through “shopping centers fever.” Despite the first malls were built in the 60’s, was during the 80’s that these malls began to spread across the country. And the construction of most of these malls only brought more social problems for cities.

Shopping in Campinas, Sao Paulo State
Dear reader, if you like shopping centers, it may be the time to stop reading this article because, as you may have noticed, I do not like them, with some exceptions.

Shopping Aricanduva in Sao Paulo is the biggest in Brazil
The shopping centers in Brazil are not just places to shop, but places to escape from the poor. As the violence spread up by cities like Rio and Sao Paulo, some entrepreneurs realized that the construction of shopping malls could be very profitable because the centres of cities was increasingly dangerous and shopping streets in neighborhoods have started to become ” dangerous” too. The malls reflect, then, the urban decay of the major Brazilian cities.

25 March Street, shopping street of Sao Paulo.
2 million people a week throughout Brazil buy products in this popular street-trade.
They are islands on which the middle class may have the false impression that things are going well, that life is good. An illusion, just that. But if were only an illusion, the problem would not be so serious, but there is a social perversity behind this:
- the lower classes are not welcome at these places and are targets of different types of discrimination. It may be the look of middle-class customers, the seller may be suspicious, or my “favorite”, when someone of lower middle class tries to buy a particular brand of clothes and the seller discreetly refuses to sell the product, giving an excuse ;
- the streets of cities are more empty and the lower classes have just left without an option to buy various types of products (economic exclusion);
- the lower classes have reduced the options of leisure, because the investments in the area of entertainment and leisure are made mostly in malls;
- schools and colleges are beginning to be installed at these places;
- small and medium-sized cities are beginning to copy the model of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

Shopping Metrô Tatuapé, connected to subway, bus and train station.
In short, most of the time, the construction of shopping malls increases the social and economic gap between the richest and the poorest and creates an illusion of security for the middle class. Of course I am not totally against the malls, as are establishments that bring benefits to the population, however, the way they are built here in Brazil, are not a solution, only the aggravation of a pre-existing problem. Only a reflection of social apartheid.
Malls are a manifestation of modern life. We can’t escape them. The concept of the huge, excellently air-conditioned one-stop gigantic shop augurs well with the problems of metropolitan places today such as traffic, congestion in the streets, oil price hike, etc.
There’s something that struck me there. If malls want to be accessible to all, and I mean all possible customers, then why discriminate against some? Doesn’t that defeat the very principle of consumerist haven?
And such people are not their target customers either! Its all niche business...
At first, malls were only to higher middle class, then middle class and now there are for lower middle class. But the thing is that consumerism in Brazil is something still is a privilege.
In fact, if you compare, this chain of malls is far more profitable than the classier malls where the more affluent go.
Plus, I think the situation is that the rich don’t really go to malls. They order their good via phone for delivery, or online, or go to designers for clothes, etc.
So, really, if we look at it, malls are for the masses. And, often, masses mean the poor.
But here, the fact is that until 10 to 20 years ago, only a few businessmen and chains have plans for the D-E classes. It was like they didn’t exist before. Only now there are plans to reach these popular classes.
Ans also, again, for the sake of good business returns, malls should sway with the trends and tendencies of inflation.
The major part of those shopping centers is for A, B and C classes. If the chains decide to make more shopping centers to D and E classes, Sao Paulo will have 200!
It’s simply appalling how the enclaves of the rich are walled apart from the slums. They become little countries instead of simple villages for the rich. Incredible!
But have something in mind: Sao Paulo is far the richest city in South America.
Even your slums are still prettier than the slums of the Third World part of Asia. LOL
Only poor will opt for cheap labour. So poverty is welcome in rich cities. Only it should not visible from their glass palaces.
Its often depicted in Chaplin films- vagrants are shown door unless they have a service to offer and that could even be clowning to attract customers! And they most welcome as customers even if they come in borrowed suits and borrowed money...
I think, ’social apartheid’ sneaks in human mind and society subconsciously and rules...
Makes one wonder about the concept of marginalization. The concept implies a smaller minority as victims. But with social apartheid, it’s the majority (the poor) that is marginalized.
LOL
For not be repetitive, I decided not to put same titles on the articles in this week, but this is the first one about the social apartheid. Tomorrow or Friday I’ll be publishing one about the Health System.
This is where Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) comes in. Business companies are required to do their bit for the socioeconomic upgrade of the communities. Since an uneven market also spells doom for business.
Pfizer, the multinational pharmaceutical company, is very strong in its CSR in the countries where it has branches. So are other pharma MNCs such as GlaxoSmithkline, etc.
There are many big businesses in Brazil that can help ease the economic deprivation of most.
In South Central region, this kind of mentality that you said is the responsible for the changes, but in
Northeastern Brazil things are bad, very bad. There are about 30 million people that still lives in the nineteenth century.
Cities where most of the population is composed of dwarfs or lepers because of
malnutrition or lack of medical care. Even cities were psoriasis is normal can be found.
Staggered echelons of swimming pool-laden apartments overlooking the sprawling favellas - what a stark distinction... and how empty must be the lives of these notionally ”wealthy” people when they hover, vulture-like and casting shadows across the poor people whose simple, sincere lives are likely truly wealthier for all their spirit and joi de vivre.
The only true wealth in life is not of, or derived from, money or material possessions... and these people in the favellas probably know this better than the (most likely) selfish shadow-casting economic predators above them...
Shopping centres... ahh the Gruen Transfer.
Celso, a good article and poignant observations. :)
This distinction is part of social fabric in Brazil. Anywhere you go, you’ll find out this kind of separation between rich and poor. And in Sao Paulo, the place where the really rich live, the things are more perverted yet.
In the other part in Brazil, you have completely abandoned and dry.
Do tourist shop in these malls? I always wonder why people travel to another country to see what is in their country already. I’d prefer shopping on the street any day and actually helping the local economy at the root!
Brazil on the contrary suffers from a different problem. It is sad to know that people are not allowed to make it to the shopping malls. This way, I never see social apartheid ending in Brazil. Instead, the gap would just keep widening, leading to worse problems.
Local Opinions (19)
I guess globalisation can be blames, because some ”bad” tendencies were imported from rich countries. Those tendencies here just make the poorest more unwelcome and more poor yet.
At first, malls were only to higher middle class, then middle class and now there are for lower middle class. But the thing is that consumerism in Brazil is something still is a privilege.
But here, the fact is that until 10 to 20 years ago, only a few businessmen and chains have plans for the D-E classes. It was like they didn’t exist before. Only now there are plans to reach these popular classes.
The major part of those shopping centers is for A, B and C classes. If the chains decide to make more shopping centers to D and E classes, Sao Paulo will have 200!
But have something in mind: Sao Paulo is far the richest city in South America.
For not be repetitive, I decided not to put same titles on the articles in this week, but this is the first one about the social apartheid. Tomorrow or Friday I’ll be publishing one about the Health System.
In South Central region, this kind of mentality that you said is the responsible for the changes, but in
Northeastern Brazil things are bad, very bad. There are about 30 million people that still lives in the nineteenth century.
Cities where most of the population is composed of dwarfs or lepers because of
malnutrition or lack of medical care. Even cities were psoriasis is normal can be found.
This distinction is part of social fabric in Brazil. Anywhere you go, you’ll find out this kind of separation between rich and poor. And in Sao Paulo, the place where the really rich live, the things are more perverted yet.
In the other part in Brazil, you have completely abandoned and dry.
Global Opinions (33)
Nice post!
I think such discrimination exists in all cities. Shopping malls are extremely class conscious destinations. Rich-poor divide is becoming more geographical and creating new boundaries within cities. We too have sprawling slums and sprawling upsacle shopping malls thriving at two different places. With no overlap.
Is globalisation to be blamed for such polarity?
Malls are a manifestation of modern life. We can’t escape them. The concept of the huge, excellently air-conditioned one-stop gigantic shop augurs well with the problems of metropolitan places today such as traffic, congestion in the streets, oil price hike, etc.
There’s something that struck me there. If malls want to be accessible to all, and I mean all possible customers, then why discriminate against some? Doesn’t that defeat the very principle of consumerist haven?
And such people are not their target customers either! Its all niche business...
In fact, if you compare, this chain of malls is far more profitable than the classier malls where the more affluent go.
Plus, I think the situation is that the rich don’t really go to malls. They order their good via phone for delivery, or online, or go to designers for clothes, etc.
So, really, if we look at it, malls are for the masses. And, often, masses mean the poor.
Ans also, again, for the sake of good business returns, malls should sway with the trends and tendencies of inflation.
It’s simply appalling how the enclaves of the rich are walled apart from the slums. They become little countries instead of simple villages for the rich. Incredible!
Even your slums are still prettier than the slums of the Third World part of Asia. LOL
Only poor will opt for cheap labour. So poverty is welcome in rich cities. Only it should not visible from their glass palaces.
Its often depicted in Chaplin films- vagrants are shown door unless they have a service to offer and that could even be clowning to attract customers! And they most welcome as customers even if they come in borrowed suits and borrowed money...
I think, ’social apartheid’ sneaks in human mind and society subconsciously and rules...
Makes one wonder about the concept of marginalization. The concept implies a smaller minority as victims. But with social apartheid, it’s the majority (the poor) that is marginalized.
LOL
This is where Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) comes in. Business companies are required to do their bit for the socioeconomic upgrade of the communities. Since an uneven market also spells doom for business.
Pfizer, the multinational pharmaceutical company, is very strong in its CSR in the countries where it has branches. So are other pharma MNCs such as GlaxoSmithkline, etc.
There are many big businesses in Brazil that can help ease the economic deprivation of most.
Staggered echelons of swimming pool-laden apartments overlooking the sprawling favellas - what a stark distinction... and how empty must be the lives of these notionally ”wealthy” people when they hover, vulture-like and casting shadows across the poor people whose simple, sincere lives are likely truly wealthier for all their spirit and joi de vivre.
The only true wealth in life is not of, or derived from, money or material possessions... and these people in the favellas probably know this better than the (most likely) selfish shadow-casting economic predators above them...
Shopping centres... ahh the Gruen Transfer.
Celso, a good article and poignant observations. :)
Do tourist shop in these malls? I always wonder why people travel to another country to see what is in their country already. I’d prefer shopping on the street any day and actually helping the local economy at the root!
Brazil on the contrary suffers from a different problem. It is sad to know that people are not allowed to make it to the shopping malls. This way, I never see social apartheid ending in Brazil. Instead, the gap would just keep widening, leading to worse problems.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 












Nice post!
I think such discrimination exists in all cities. Shopping malls are extremely class conscious destinations. Rich-poor divide is becoming more geographical and creating new boundaries within cities. We too have sprawling slums and sprawling upsacle shopping malls thriving at two different places. With no overlap.
Is globalisation to be blamed for such polarity?
I guess globalisation can be blames, because some ”bad” tendencies were imported from rich countries. Those tendencies here just make the poorest more unwelcome and more poor yet.